MENU
Business.com aims to help business owners make informed decisions to support and grow their companies. We research and recommend products and services suitable for various business types, investing thousands of hours each year in this process.
As a business, we need to generate revenue to sustain our content. We have financial relationships with some companies we cover, earning commissions when readers purchase from our partners or share information about their needs. These relationships do not dictate our advice and recommendations. Our editorial team independently evaluates and recommends products and services based on their research and expertise. Learn more about our process and partners here.
Contingency Theory is a unique approach to leadership.
Leadership plays a crucial role in attracting new employees and team productivity. Various theories of leadership propose different styles for how to guide your team to success. However, 55 percent of CEOs said developing the next generation of leaders is their top challenge, reported DDI’s Global Leadership Forecast. Fred Fiedler’s contingency theory emphasizes the impact of situations on a leader’s effectiveness and highlights adaptability as a key trait.
Read on to learn about Fiedler’s theory and how you can apply it to become a better leader.
Contingency theory, which also goes by Fiedler’s contingency model and Fiedler’s theory of leadership, proposes no single correct or right way to lead a business due to the various internal and external factors that influence leadership’s effectiveness. Fiedler’s contingency trait theory and contingency management theory emphasize the correlation between a leader’s traits and their effectiveness to suggest that leadership styles should adapt to different situations. The theory highlights the importance of self-awareness, objectivity and adaptability in determining the most effective leadership approach for a given situation. The theory suggests that two factors rely on a successful leader: natural leadership style and situational favorableness.
Fiedler’s contingency model proposes a simple concept — comparing your leadership style to the demands of a particular situation. Here is how Fiedler’s model breaks down into these three concepts.
Fiedler created the least-preferred co-worker (LPC) scale to help identify leadership styles, which measure whether managers have a task-oriented or relationship-oriented approach. A positive rating on the scale indicates a relationship-oriented leader who is skilled in building connections and managing interpersonal dynamics. Conversely, a less favorable rating suggests a task-oriented leader who is focused on efficiency and effectiveness.
The next step in the model is to assess the situation using situational contingency theory. The favorability of a situation depends on leader-member relations, task structure and position power. Strong trust between the leader and team members, clear task requirements and high position power contribute to a more favorable situation for effective leadership.
The model suggests different leadership styles thrive in specific situations. Task-oriented leaders are successful in highly favorable or unfavorable situations, while relationship-oriented leaders succeed in moderately favorable situations. [Read more about Human Relations Management Theory Basics.]
While every business owner has their own way of leading their company, the contingency approach focuses on the issue at hand and the ways owners may need to adjust their leadership style depending on the pressing concern. Here are a few ways you can implement the contingency model into your company.
You can classify your business using these three variables:
Leaders are able to use contingency theory to exert a better influence on employees if they can build strong relationships with them. Contingency theory management allows leaders to have more influence over employees who detail the tasks, as opposed to leaders who don’t structure tasks. [Read more about Classical and Scientific Management Theory.]
Fiedler’s contingency theory says there are various internal and external factors that can influence the optimum organizational structure. Internal factors include the business’s size, the technology used, leadership style and how the business adapts to strategic changes.
Most of the time, business owners can’t control outside factors — such as the marketplace and customer orientation — which means they should address these issues differently than the way they would with internal factors.
It’s also crucial for leaders to consider the different external and internal factors before they determine their leadership style. The most effective approach is to modify the leadership style to the situation or vice versa. [Read more about The Management Theory of Frank and Lillian Gilbreth.]
Request that your managers rate one co-worker they least enjoy working with using the LPC scale. The scale uses between 18 and 25 adjectives, such as pleasant and unpleasant, interesting and boring, or supportive and hostile, on an eight-point scale. A score above 73 means you hold the characteristics of a relationship-oriented leader. Anything below 54 means you are a task-oriented leader. Those who fall between 55 and 72 are considered both relationship-oriented and task-oriented leaders, which means you might need to delve further into other leadership theories to determine your preferred style.
Investing time each day in getting to know your subordinates reinforces your position in a contingency theory of leadership model, which allows you to apply more influence on employees.
Chad Brooks contributed to the writing and research in this article.